WICMA - Magazine Feb 2015
I
want things cheaper so when I bought this pair of jeans from a retail outlet I
was gushing at the discount I got compared to a branded one which I had bought
earlier. It is a different thing that the fitting was not right and the
material felt rough. But I sidetracked those concerns considering the savings.
However, after few rounds of wash, the stitching started getting frayed and the
material stretched unevenly. In the end I was pretty upset that my great
bargain deal was such a flop. Well, it was bound to be for obvious reasons!
Everyone
wants everything cheaper these days but the best of the quality. How much
cheaper? Honestly, most people don’t know the answer to this question so
anything lesser than the price currently being quoted is great. Why don’t
people know how much cheaper? Because they don’t have the capability to figure
out the method to calculate or are too lazy to do the legwork.
This
is a constant demand in our packaging business too. Customers want cheaper
cartons while insisting that we stick to their quality requirement. Most
purchasers consider this to be the easiest way of saving costs. There are quite
a few reasons; one of them being priority of payment. Packing material
suppliers are the last ones to be considered while scheduling payment. There is
too much competition in this segment and the work is not rocket science hence,
every supplier can be replaced easily (well most of the time).
But
the chief reason is lack of hard work and analysis. If one really wants to save
costs, they need to fundamentally change the product and processes not the 1 or
2% of the packaging cost. There are ample scope for improvements and waste
reduction if the basic product itself is analyzed and redesigned. But this
requires serious involvement and hard work. It requires time and resolve to
conduct root cause analysis. There is need for data collection, analysis,
testing and rechecking. Most people are hence content with reducing the packing
material cost which is least hard work and creates the illusion of saving and
becoming cost competitive! It is when more international biggies come into the
market will these companies realize what is competitive
edge?
Businesses
do not understand that there are other ways of properly reducing packaging
costs. One good idea is to put some serious brains into design and drawing
specifications. The designer quite often simply copies an existing template and
changes dimensions. If you ask why they need BS of 20 and not 15, rarely will
you get a clear answer. Often the specifications are more than what is truly
required which jacks up the price. Everyone wants to play safe by adding
unnecessary buffer and to cover for shortcomings.
Another
way is to focus on advance planning. Now the larger buyers want “just-in-time” since
they do not know what they want and when. If a corrugator is given proper forecast
of requirement then they can build up inventory to meet the delivery dates
instead of stocking up for anything anytime. Inventory turns will be more and
the carrying cost will be less.
Let us take an example of Company A and
B.
Company A has random requirements and
n-number of carton sizes designed and developed by people over a period of time.
They are not following any forecast method to identify which type of cartons
will be required when. When the item is ready or nearing completion, the carton
suppliers are asked to deliver the cartons. At the time of seeking payment,
Company A delays at random without any reason. Often they feel humiliated if
the suppliers follow up for payment or show a laid back approach towards
releasing payment. The adage – customer is king is often taken too literally by
many buyers. But they forget that the kingdom prospers due to its many subjects
and not just the king.
Company B has created a standardized
set of cartons to pack all their items in atleast one of them. (This is what
today’s E-commerce companies are practicing). They have a clear system of
tracking which items are being ordered, manufactured and are at what stage of
completion. There is a visibility of status in the process. This company also
has a data stating how much time is needed to make one item and ship. Based on
this, whenever an item goes into production, all the relevant suppliers are
intimated of the same. This gives every supplier time to plan their production
and delivery schedules. Company B also believes in sharing historical data,
future plans and planning schedules on a regular basis with their suppliers. Taking
a step forward, they also communicate the material receipt and payment
processing dates creating good levels of transparency and timely information
delivery.
It is obvious that the supplier of
Company B is not going to stock too much inventory and buy as required. They
will also supply as per the time schedule and have a fair idea of the payment
cycle. Continuous procurement will also help the supplier to plan production at
their end. Payment and order cycle reliability automatically will impact cost
of production and price of the item. Company B will surely demand good quality
at lower rates and get it too.
The
reliability of timely payment trumps all the other options. If a supplier is
assured of timely payment and the commitment is honored regularly, the offered
rates will be automatically cheaper. However, no one sticks to the payment
cycle, everyone delays and hence, somewhere there is a compromise in quality or
buffering in costs.
How is China so competitive in the
manufacturing sector? Cost cutting as a means to remain
competitive is a shallow approach. There are larger economic factors at play
which pushes up the price. Fuel costs, taxes, cost of operating a business,
lack of infrastructure, the labor market all contribute to the increasing
costs. If these are contained, automatically our products can become cheaper in
the global arena. We need some serious root cause analysis and structured
approach to cutting costs as an organization and not squeeze the ever
dispensable packaging material supplier.
Though
it can also be argued that these suppliers lack organized approach towards
pricing, quality and need to work in a framework of specified price band like
many paper mills supplying Kraft paper. Is there a scope for improvement
amongst us corrugators?